Economic diameter of penstock
The weight and first cost of the penstock increases
with increasing diameter, the output in electrical energy is also increased
owing to the reduction in frictional headloss. The economic diameter for a
penstock required to carry a discharge Q is the one at which annual costs due
to greater investment do not exceed the annual value of resulting increment
energy output. Mathematically, this criterion may be expressed by the relationdC1dD≤dC2dD where C1 is the annual cost
due to the investment for a pipe of a diameter D1 and C2
is the value of energy that can be produced at the same diameter.
Let H be the design head at any section. Shell thickness b
=0.1HD2σ , where σ = permissible stress in steel
Weight of penstock section of unit length say 1 meter, adding
20% additional allowance neglecting joint efficiency = 1.2 ×7850πDb
=1.2×7850π×0.1H×D22σ =1480HD2σ
Weight of pipe of length L meter will be 1480HD2Lσ kg
If annual operating charges including depreciation and
maintenance is taken proportional to first cost
C1=k11480HD2Lσ
Therefore dC1dD=2×1480k1HLσD
Let us now consider the influence of the change in diameter on
the annual energy output and its value.
Friction head loss =λLv22gD =λLv22g(πD24)2D =λLQ212.1×D5
With a head H and discharge Q, power potential is 9.81QH [kW]
Taking overall efficiency as 80%, the potential power
corresponding to frictional loss will be
9.81×80% (λLv212.1×D5)Q [kW]
If t is annual duration of operation in hours the energy
generated will be
9.81×0.8012.1×λLQ3tD5 [kWh]
=0.65×λLQ3tD5 [kWh]
If k2 is the value of energy at generator terminals
C2= 0.65×λLQ3tD5 ×k2
Therefore dC2dD=-5×0.65×λLQ3tD6×k2
So, 2×1480k1HDLσ≤ 3.25𝝀LQ3tD6×k2t
D7≤3.252×1480×λσk2k1×Q3Ht
Now, D ≤ ({11100×λσk2k1×Q3Ht})1.7 [m]
Where,
Q = discharge in cumecs
H= design head in meters
σ= allowable stress in steel in kg/cm2
K1= Annual cost of penstock per kg
K2= value of one kWh at generator terminals in the
same units
t = annual duration of operation in hours
𝝀=
friction coefficient, value of which may be taken as 0.02 for preliminary
estimates
0 Comments